Dubai Lynx scam scandal: withdraws AOY prize

The organisers of the 3rd Dubai Lynx Awards have withdrawn the Agency of the Year award from FP7 Doha and the trophy will subsequently now not be awarded this year.
Investigations after this year's award show have revealed numerous examples of work from FP7 Doha that did not meet the Dubai Lynx entry criteria and subsequently these 18 submissions and the associated seven awards have been withdrawn. Those awards were: 1 Gold Print campaign, 1 Gold TV/Cinema campaign, 3 Silver Print campaigns, 1 Silver Outdoor campaign and 1 Bronze TV/Cinema campaign. In addition, ten pieces which were shortlisted in the Print and Outdoor sections were also disqualified. FP7 is part of the Interpublic Group.
Samsung.jpgUK trade website Brand Republic carried a story two days ago on a scam controversy featuring a Samsung ad that was not authorised by the client. Brand Republic quotes the client Sunny Hwang, the president of Samsung Electronics Levant, who stated: "At no time was Samsung Electronics aware of these advertisements and the company has not approved or commissioned FP7 to create any advertising campaigns." See full story here.

"Even before the awards night we had withdrawn a number of pieces of work from the competition but subsequently our investigation has found other pieces that were presented to the jury that infringed our requirement that all work presented must represent the client who approved it. Our rules are very clear with regards to this, and we have no hesitation in withdrawing these awards," said Philip Thomas, Dubai Lynx CEO. "The Dubai Lynx Awards exist to celebrate and raise the creative bar of genuine work of the region. Activities like this show a disregard not only for the Awards but more importantly for the juries who work so hard judging the event. Due to the scale of withdrawals we feel it inappropriate to honour FP7 Doha as Agency of the Year and so will be withdrawing the prize. I hope that this swift action makes clear our determination to build an award with true integrity for the region," continued Thomas.
The Dubai International Advertising Festival and Lynx Awards, which took place earlier this month, are held in association with the IAA - UAE Chapter. Dr. Lance de Masi, Chapter President, commented: "In taking such swift action the Lynx organisers have demonstrated their understanding that in order to fulfil the purpose of incentivising and rewarding creative excellence in the region, Lynx must safeguard compliance with the stated conditions of eligibility. To do otherwise would be to undermine credibility."

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Dubai Lynx scam scandal: withdraws AOY prize.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.campaignbrief.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4763

44 Comments

Anonymous said:

wow it doesn't even look like a scam ad

Anonymous said:

Ouch!

Anonymous said:

show me the ad in dubai lynx that wasnt scam.

Anonymous said:

its stupid from the agency to do the obvious scam on a client they dont even have.

its stupid from the show to make such a big deal out of it. if they only allow real legit work next year they wont have any entries.

Anonymous said:

Yellow pages?

Anonymous said:

I'm with 9.33... BUT I imagine the magnitude of the offence (amount of winners) required notable action, surely.

I don't think this will change a thing - what is truly 'scam' is such a grey area, and it always will be. It's here to stay.

Anonymous said:

When Ben Johnson got caught using roids, everyone felt so much better about themselves because they nailed the bad guy.

Of course, it turned out that pretty much everyone else in that race was also on the gear.


Anonymous said:


If scam ads are here to stay does that mean real ads are dead?

Anonymous said:

OMG

Anonymous said:

Don't they cut your leg off for this in the Middle East?

Anonymous said:

Let this be the first of many.

Anonymous said:

"Dubai-ous". adj. Describing an ad with a very suspect background, usually viewed only on adsoftheworld.com, which subsequently picks up metal.

Anonymous said:

Oops.

Anonymous said:


9:59's comment 'What is truly 'scam' is such a grey area and always will be' must rank in the top 3 most ridiculous comments ever on this blog.

So, I'll try and make it so simple even he/she will understand why he/she is wrong and always will be wrong.

1] Did the client approve of the ad [whether briefed or an agency initiative]?

and

2] Did the client pay for the ad and approve and pay for the media?

If the answer to either is 'yes' it's a scam/illegitimate or whatever else you like to call it and ALWAYS WILL BE.

What's so grey about that?

Anonymous said:

Quarantine Asian agencies right now. If this is allowed to spread the whole world of advertising could become infected.

Anonymous said:

errr, 1:12pm, did you re-read that before posting?

'Dubai-ous' is gold

Maybe Dubai is the new Singapore. Should be pointed out though that Doha is in Qatar.

Anonymous said:

I think there is definitely room for proactivity and initiative work in our industry, some clients need a kick up the pants and doing work proactively is a great way of helping them see what's possibly. But this is just flat out retarded, I mean, seriously? Did they really think they'd get away with that? It's not like Samsung is a little brand either.

Anonymous said:

The thing is that Manly have now lost 3 from 3.

Anonymous said:

Years ago they might have got away with it. The web has put a stop to that. Bloggers can be much more diligent than judges. See here for example: http://bloganubis.com/2009/03/21/enough-is-enough/

Anonymous said:

I agree with 2.22. Bang on.

Anonymous said:

2.22, I think about Manly daily.

Anonymous said:

I feel sorry for the Manly Daily.

With all this cracking down on scam they'll be feeling the impact of the economic downturn pretty severely.

Anonymous said:

2.21:
There is a difference between proactive/initiative and scam. There is nothing wrong when you do a proactive ad for a client as long as they subsequently approve it and pay to run it. That's good business practice.

But if they don't approve and pay for it it is a scam and should be eradicated.

Anonymous said:

Is Yellow Pages in this dirty lot? I need to know.

Anonymous said:

That blog is interesting stuff. When they scam, those FP7 guys don't fuck around, do they?

Anonymous said:

2:21, unfortunately an 'initiative' ad is seldom conceived with the client's interests at heart. It's usually a shameless attempt to win glory for its creators, no matter how much post-rationalisation occurs afterwards.

Anonymous said:

Dubai?

Who gives a fuck.

Anonymous said:

WHAT??! PEOPLE DO SCAMS?!!

Anonymous said:

Someone (above) says "Did the client pay for the ad and approve and pay for the media?"

Me, I don't give a shite if the client doesn't pay for the ad.

A lot of ads in the catagory - 'Heres a dead baby, where's my award' (or public service as it's sometimes called) aren't paid for by the client.

For me the only thing that MUST happen, is that the client gives permission for the ad to run.

If they do - fair enough.

Anonymous said:

6.46.
The point is not that people do scams. It's that people who do scams are finally being outed as the frauds they are and rightly being stripped of awards they do not deserve to win. Let's hope this carries over into Cannes

Anonymous said:

Sadly they've ruined it for the rest of us. A lot of agencies do spec/proactive work for their OWN clients and enter it ALONG WITH real their real paid work iinto the award shows but at least it is for their own clients. It's somewhat palatable then. However if the agency's entire body of award work is scam, that is very sad and wrong and it isn't fair for the rest of the creatives of the world who do proactive work for their own clients. This sort of shit makes clients very dubious of agencies and then they refuse to run a proactive piece for awards at all. The truth is a lot of clients also want to be famous with awards but given the amount of press this catastrophe has received, even the adventurous clients will start to play it safe. And that is the beginning of the end for creativity.

peter said:

Some people may think that Dubai is the new creative centre of the universe,but everyone knows those that work there only do so because they have to.......and now they're being outed.....good.

Anonymous said:

Only a couple people can really share the truth about those ads, but I suspect it made through last years crop of genetically modified work without entering the local press, just like a lot of other copies and scams from FP7, Saatchi's and JWT. They were lucky to get away with what they did as most of us over here knew what they had question marks over the authenticity, they weren't outed like this year's batch.

You only have to read the Dubai press regularly and this stuff never appears in it other than in the creative's dreams.

Scams are passable. But the real issue over here is the blatant copying of other people's work. I'm not talking about the coincidence of two ideas but the exact copying and only replacing a logo. It's a disgraceful act.

Now that I've had my rant, if you don't mind I have to go and bleach my dish-dash from the camel fun I had earlier.

Wesley Trailblazer said:

Our worth is as inflated as the stock market was 18 months ago. It's not real, people. Awards aren't real, but the money that turns around on them is. My mum doesn't know what a Cannes Lion is. She thinks a Clio is car made by Renault and AWARD is what school leavers get paid. Only in Adland do these trade awards hold such import. I have a few friends in the plumbing trade. I have no idea what the plumbing industry gongs are called, but I know for a fact most plumbers don't give a shit about them. And they get paid considerably more than most of us. Advertising awards are like publishing your own poetry. You pay a couple of hundred bucks and get to see your name in a book that only the authors will ever read. But you know what the dumbest thing is? I know all this and I still play the game because for now, awards mean respect, profile and the use of my MD's boat.

Anonymous said:

Running ads without clients' approval is the biggest sin an agency can do, reminds me of a similar incident back in 2000 where a campaign for a zoo was found to be illegally entered without client's knowledge. Subsequently the Cannes Lion was stripped from the agency. Speaking of clients, surely the ones that embraces
pro-active work, they wouldn't be that stupid to approve ads if they thought the agency wasn't doing a great day-to day job on their brand in the first place.

Anonymous said:

In Dubai it's called 'Mirage' advertising.

Anonymous said:

As long as agencies are dumb enough to allow CD's to use them for their own personal gain, this will always happen.

Note to CEOs (if any read this blog): If your ECD tries to tell you that the best way to grow your business is to win bucketloads of awards via 'proactive' work... laugh at him/them. Because all he's going to do is use your agency, win HIS awards, quit and leave you in the shit with a whole bunch of disgruntled clients. Disgruntled because they've either been ignored, or been bullied into running work the really didn't like.

Anonymous said:

An interesting footnote to the Taronga Zoo scam scandal of 2000, 9:42.

The creative director (who when he was hired was told to win awards for the agency) was fired and went on to start a BrandPower type of operation, which you might describe as the very opposite strategy to one of award-winning creativity.

The lesson here is that to some people advertising is an opportunity for fame and/or money and it really doesn't matter how you achieve those goals.

Perhaps they understand the industry better than the poor saps (I think that's most of us) who think it's about doing nice ads.

Anonymous said:

11:59

you lame douche

Anonymous said:

I saw an ad come out of Dubai last week for Ansett.

theblueskymind said:

jail the scammers--that should stop the practice.

and lest some creatives think we're nothing but spoilsports, let's hold a yearly Scamfest! a brilliant gallery of "what-ought-to-bes" that should keep creatives well-oiled and give legit clients, well, ideas.

Anonymous said:

anti creativity

Anonymous said:

Just withdrawing the ADs wont help.
Punish the guilty.

Leave a comment

 

CAMPAIGN BRIEF Gold Sponsors

  • <

CAMPAIGN BRIEF Silver Sponsors

  • <

CAMPAIGN BRIEF Bronze Sponsors

Custom Search

FREE to Subscribe


Campaign Brief Magazine

Subscribe or view online to the region's most influential creative ad magazines - Campaign Brief (Australia/NZ) and Campaign Brief Asia.
Order Download the subscription form (PDF)

Advertise in the region's most influential creative ad magazines.
Order Download the rate card for Campaign Brief (Australia/NZ) or Campaign Brief Asia.

About CAMPAIGNBRIEF

A blog for advertising creatives in Australia. Or view it online. To pass on news or advertise on the blog, or to subscribe to Campaign Brief Australia/NZ or CB Asia, or The Work 07 Annual, email:


About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by CB published on April 2, 2009 9:10 AM .

Tangerine in April was the previous entry in this blog.

Coca-Cola myth busted by ACCC is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.25