Tony Clewett's D&AD Diary - Day Three

tc 5.jpgTony Clewett, creative director of DraftFCB NZ, is a judge on the D&AD Direct jury which has just wound up day three. He writes exclusively for Campaign Brief.

Day three.

It was yellow pencil day.

Careers were made. Pay rises were secured. Creative teams were gearing up to go on all night benders. Well, after the awards are announced tomorrow night at least.
tony1.jpgAnd I experienced just why it's so hard to win that elusive pencil.

From our shortlist (with plenty of Aussie contenders - a real theme in Direct this year) we poked and prodded the work trying to find any weak points.

The D&AD has always stood for creative excellence - and we weren't going to let it down. Which means we turned into stingy bastards.

What I can reveal is that only two pencils were awarded in our category. Scary really after such a mountain of work.

But here's a couple of tips for winning next year. Do some amazing Direct copy. You'll win for sure. Do some amazing Art Direction for Direct. Again, the pencil will follow. And bizarrely, do some great DM (include idea please) and fame will be yours (check out the pic of the stripped-bare DM tables with the shortlisted work left on it - sad sight really). If you want to make things difficult for yourself, play in the Direct integrated space. Good luck with that.

Now, I'm off to have a pint in a good 'ole fashioned English pub. It's thirsty work making (and destroying) people's careers.

Leave a comment

About Campaign Brief Asia

A blog for advertising creatives in Asia. To pass on news or advertise on the CB Asia blog, or to subscribe to Campaign Brief Asia or Campaign Brief Australia/NZ magazines, or The Work 09 Annual, email: Kim or Michael

Latest jobs

Retrieving latest jobs

House rules for commenting

Here are the ground rules for posting comments on stories: This site is a moderated blog. Comments that are seen to be more abusive than witty and/or constructive will not be posted. Obviously, we do not allow 'hate speech' or comments that are seen as a personal attack, defamatory, degrading or prejudicial to an individual or company. Overly abusive language also adds nothing to any discussion and will not be published. On occasions we will be asking people to contribute work, opinions and views on various topics - you are free to disagree, so long as you observe the above rules and remain constructive.